AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

TYRON MARK HOLMES, Petitioner v. STEPHEN ROBERTS, Respondent.

ORDER

HUGH LAWSON, District Judge

Before the Court is petitioner TYRON MARK HOLMES'S notice of appeal (Tab # 24) from the Court's September 26, 2008 order, which adopted Magistrate Judge Claude W. Hicks's recommendation that petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 motion be denied as untimely.

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has mandated that the Court construe petitioner's notice of appeal as an application for a certificate of appealability ("COA") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). Edwards v. United States , 114 F.3d 1083 (11th Cir. 1997). Under section 2253(c), a COA may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. For the reasons stated in Magistrate Judge Hicks's recommendation and this Court's order accepting the same, the Court finds that petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Accordingly, the application for a COA is DENIED.

Also before the Court is petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Tab # 26). Said motion is DENIED AS MOOT.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOLMES v. ROBERTS
(Dec 1, 2008)