Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

James Ingerson, Petitioner, v. Robert Hofmann, Respondent.

ORDER

WILLIAM SESSIONS III, District Judge

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed November 12, 2008. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report.

The respondent's motion to dismiss (Paper 10) is DENIED and that the following briefing schedule is ordered. The respondent has 30 days from the date of this order to argue for dismissal. Petitioner has 30 days in which to reply. To the extent that petitioner raises new arguments in his reply, the respondent should be allowed to file additional memorandum, addressing only those new arguments, within 10 days of the date the reply is served.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

INGERSON v. HOFMANN
(Dec 4, 2008)