Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In opposition to the plaintiff's prima facie showing that the defect which caused her trip-and-fall accident was created by the defendant's negligence in repairing the roadway in question ( see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324), the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see CPLR 3212 [b]). Furthermore, proof that a dangerous condition is open and obvious does not preclude a finding of negligence against a landowner for the failure to maintain the property in a safe condition, but is relevant on the issue of the plaintiff's comparative negligence ( see Cupo v Karfunkel, 1 AD3d 48, 52). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly awarded summary judgment to the plaintiff on the issue of the defendant's negligence.