AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of PUTNAM COUNTY NATIONAL BANK, Respondent, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellant.

Ordered that the order dated February 15, 2008, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant admittedly received an order dated October 27, 2006, which was entered upon its default in opposing the petition, as early as November 17, 2006, but did not move to vacate that order, on the ground of excusable neglect, until December 18, 2007. The appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its lengthy delay in moving to vacate the order. Under all of the circumstances, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant's motion, which was made more than one year after it obtained actual notice of the order granting the petition ( see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Malik v Noe, 54 AD3d 733; Allen v Preston, 123 AD2d 303).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PUTNAM CTY. NATL. v. JP MORGAN
(Dec 9, 2008)