AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH CAUFIELD, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying, without an evidentiary hearing, the defendant's motion to withdraw his pleas of guilty. The defendant's conclusory allegations that he was coerced to enter the plea agreements were directly belied by the record of the plea proceedings ( see People v Owens, 43 AD3d 1185; People v Morales, 17 AD3d 487; People v Rangolan, 295 AD2d 543; People v Fernandez, 291 AD2d 456).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CAUFIELD
(Dec 16, 2008)