Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

GARY D. PRICE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CORNING, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

CRAIG KELLISON, Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Pending before the court is defendants' unopposed motion for summary judgment (Docs. 18, 33).

Pursuant to the scheduling order issued April 4, 2008 (Doc. 7), discovery is closed and the time to file pretrial motions has passed. This matter is currently set for trial on February 23, 2009, and the parties are required to file pretrial statements on or before January 12, 2009. However, because the pending motion for summary judgment may be dispositive of the entire case, the remaining dates in the scheduling order will be vacated. If the motion for summary judgment is denied, the court will issue an order setting a new trial and pretrial date.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The remaining dates set forth in the scheduling order (Doc. 7), including the January 12, 2009 deadline for pretrial statements and the February 23, 2009 trial, are vacated; and

2. If the pending motion for summary judgment is denied, the court will issue an order setting new trial and pretrial dates.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PRICE v. CITY OF CORNING
(Jan 2, 2009)