Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KATRICE ETCHIN, Defendant.

ORDER

BARBARA CRABB, District Judge

Defendant Katrice Etchin moved to suppress evidence seized from her apartment when law enforcement officers conducted a search of the apartment under a warrant issued by a judge of the Circuit Court for Dane County. The magistrate judge recommended denial of the motion in a report and recommendation entered on December 18, 2009. Defendant has objected to the recommendation.

After reviewing defendant's objections, the magistrate judge's report; and the parties' briefs, I am persuaded that the magistrate judge's recommendation is correct, for the reasons stated in his December 18 report and in his earlier report, addressing a motion to suppress the same evidence filed by defendant's co-defendant, Maurice Bowman. It is not necessary to add to his thorough analysis of the facts and law.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that the report entered by United States Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker is ADOPTED as the court's own and defendant Katrice Etchin's motion to suppress the evidence seized from her apartment on October 28, 2007 is DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. ETCHIN
(Jan 2, 2009)