AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

TONY D. THOMPSON, Petitioner, v. HUGH SMITH, Warden, Respondent.

ORDER

LISA WOOD, District Judge

Presently before the Court are Petitioner Tony Thompson's ("Thompson") Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated October 31, 2008. In his Objections, Thompson asserts his petition is a "true" Rule 60(b)(4)(6) motion and this Court has jurisdiction to rule on the merits of his petition. (Doc. No. 13, p. 2). Thompson contends his motion does not attack the Court's resolution of the merits of one of his claims but a "defect in the integrity of the federal habeas proceeding." (Id.) According to Thompson, this Court erred by failing to rule on the merits of his incompetency claim presented in Case Number CV503-36.

Contrary to Thompson's assertions, the Magistrate Judge addressed Thompson's incompetency claim in Case Number CV503-36 in light of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). (See CV503-36, Doc. No. 40, pp. 10-12). In addition, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals denied Thompson a Certificate of Appealability because he "failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." (Doc. No. 64, p. 1).

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Thompson's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THOMPSON v. SMITH
(Jan 5, 2009)