THOMAS TUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge
This case comes before the Court on Debtors' "Second Motion to Reconsider Re-Opening Case," filed on December 31, 2008 (Docket # 26), which this Court construes as another motion for reconsideration of the December 24, 2008 Order dismissing this case (Docket # 19), and
The Court having reviewed and considered the Motion, and
The Court finds the Motion fails to demonstrate a palpable defect by which the Court and the parties have been misled, and that a different disposition of the case must result from a correction thereof. See Local Rule 9024-1(a)(3).
In addition, the Court notes the following. First, the allegations in the Motion do not establish excusable neglect under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1), FedR.Bankr.P. 9024, or any other valid ground for relief from the order dismissing this case.
Second, the latest amended Bankruptcy Petition Cover Sheet, filed on December 31, 2008 (Docket # 25), is not signed by anyone, and is therefore a nullity.
NOW, THEREFORE,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion (Docket # 26) should be, and is, DENIED.