Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Vergie H. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pete GEREN, Acting Secretary of the United States Air Force, Defendant-Appellee.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Vergie H. White appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing her action alleging race discrimination against minority employees at Edwards Air Force Base. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo an order dismissing for failure to state a claim. Ortez v. Washington County, 88 F.3d 804, 807 (9th Cir. 1996). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed White's Title VII claim because White did not fully exhaust her administrative remedies. See Jasch v. Potter, 302 F.3d 1092, 1094 (9th Cir. 2002) ("In order to bring a Title VII cause of action against a federal government agency in district court, [plaintiff] must first exhaust his administrative remedies.").

The district court properly dismissed White's class action claims because White, proceeding pro se, was not an adequate class representative. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a)(4) (requiring that class representative be able to "fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class"); McShane v. United States, 366 F.2d 286, 288 (9th Cir. 1966) (holding that a lay person lacks authority to appear as an attorney for others).

White's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WHITE v. GEREN
(Jan 26, 2009)