Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant argues that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the defense of justification. However, contrary to his contention, the justification defense does not apply to the charges of either attempted robbery in the first degree ( see People v Ware, 36 AD3d 838, 839; People v Ellison, 175 AD2d 846), or criminal possession of the weapon in the third degree ( see People v Pons, 68 NY2d 264, 266; People v Almodovar, 62 NY2d 126, 130; People v Smith, 54 AD3d 421, 422; People v Tasheem, 298 AD2d 411, 412).