Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BAJRO HOTI, Appellant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed. The mandatory surcharge, crime victim assistance fee and DNA databank fee are not components of a defendant's sentence ( see People v Guerrero, 12 NY3d 45 [decided today]). Accordingly, the court's failure to pronounce the sur-charge and fees prior to the entry of defendant's plea did not deprive the defendant of the opportunity to knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently choose among alternative courses of action ( cf. People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 245).

Taking no part: Chief Judge LIPPMAN.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HOTI
(Feb 19, 2009)