Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number Nos. 07-35443, 07-35495. Attorney(S) Karen Kathryn Koehler, Esquire, Stritmatter Kessler Whelan Withey Coluccio, Seattle, WA, Fred H. Shepherd, Esquire, Arnold Anderson Vickery, Esquire, Paul F. Waldner, Esquire, Vickery Waldner Mallia, LLP, Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. John R. Ipsaro, Esquire, Jeffrey R. Schaefer, Esquire, Mary Lynn Tate, Esquire, Joseph Thomas, Esquire, Ulmer Berne, Cincinnati, OH, Jeffrey Royal Johnson, Carin A. Marney, Esquire, Williams Kastner Gibbs, PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Defendants-Appellees. Judges Johnnie B. Rawlinson David Alan Ezra Acts Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — Courts Of Appeals — Jurisdiction And Venue — Final Decisions Of District Courts See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. Y v. nne A'Rae LAISURE-RADKE, Indi MEMORANDUM This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Y'vonne A'Rae Laisure-Radke appeals the district court's order granting Pharmaceutical Resources, Inc.'s, and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc.'s (collectively "Defendants") motion to dismiss. The district court held that judicial estoppel barred Laisure-Radke from asserting her claims against Defendants. We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court's application of judicial estoppel for an abuse of discretion. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire Cos. Co., 270 F.3d 778, 782 (9th Cir. 2001). We affirm. Because Laisure-Radke failed to disclose the existence of her claims against Defendants in her bankruptcy petition and obtained a discharge of her debts based on this failure to disclose, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it concluded that judicial estoppel barred Lai-sure-Radke's claims. See id. at 784-85. That Laisure-Radke later moved to reopen her bankruptcy proceedings does not excuse her earlier failure to disclose; judicial estoppel ensures that debtors make a "full and honest disclosure" of their assets in the original bankruptcy proceeding. See id. at 785 (internal quotation omitted). Because we affirm the district court's dismissal of Laisure-Radke's claims, we do not reach the issues raised in Defendants' cross-appeal. AFFIRMED.