AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of TAMIR C., Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER VINCENT H., Respondent.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

After communicating with the General Court of Justice of the State of North Carolina (hereinafter the North Carolina court), the Family Court, Kings County, properly transferred to the North Carolina court the petition to vacate an acknowledgment of paternity ( see Domestic Relations Law § 76-e; cf. Matter of Williams v Taylor, 20 AD3d 484). The State of North Carolina, where a custody dispute between the parties was pending, was the child's home state and, thus, the North Carolina court had jurisdiction substantially in conformity with the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, which is codified in Domestic Relations Law article 5-A ( see Domestic Relations Law § 76-e; § 76 [1] [a]; § 75-a [7]).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TAMIR v. VINCENT
(Feb 24, 2009)