Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

CAROLYN CHARLEY, Appellant, v. MARGARET E. GOSS et al., Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.

Defendants Howard Conroy and Margaret Goss presented prima facie evidence, including plaintiffs deposition testimony and medical records, that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) ( see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345). In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHARLEY v. GOSS
(Feb 24, 2009)