AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

MAXEN CAPITAL, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TIMOTHY SUTHERLAND, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

LEE ROSENTHAL, District Judge

The plaintiffs, Maxen Capital, LLC, William Baker, and Robert Erwin, filed a motion to strike the defendants' "late-filed" reply to the plaintiffs' response to the defendants' motion to dismiss. (Docket Entry No. 15, 17). The defendants filed a response. (Docket Entry No. 16). The motion to strike is based on the fact that the court's deadline for the defendants' reply was February 16, 2009. The reply was filed on February 17. As the defendants point out, however, the filing was timely because February 16 was a federal holiday — Washington's Birthday — and under Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the deadline was the "next day that is not . . . a legal holiday," February 17.

The motion to strike is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MAXEN CAPITAL, LLC v. SUTHERLAND (S.D.Tex. 2-26-2009)
(Feb 26, 2009)