Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHARLES HEATHERLY, THOMAS SPAMPINATO, W. EDWARD GOODALL, JR., PAUL STAM, WAKE COUNTY TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION, AND THE NORTH CAROLINA FAMILY POLICY COUNCIL, PLAINTIFFS, WILLIS WILLIAMS, NORTH CAROLINA FAIR SHARE, AND NORTH CAROLINA COMMON SENSE FOUNDATION, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENORS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; CHARLES A. SANDERS, BRYAN E. BEATTY, LINDA CARLISLE, ROBERT A. FARRIS, JR., JOHN R. McARTHUR, JIM WOODWARD, AND ROBERT W. APPLETON, MEMBERS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA LOTTERY COMMISSION, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES; NORTH CAROLINA LOTTERY COMMISSION; THOMAS N. SHAHEEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE NORTH CAROLINA EDUCATION LOTTERY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; MICHAEL F. EASLEY, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; AND RICHARD H. MOORE, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, DEFENDANTS.

PER CURIAM.

Justice MARTIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, the remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Barham v. Hawk, 360 N.C. 358, 625 S.E.2d 778 (2006).

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HEATHERLY v. STATE
(Mar 1, 2009)