AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

HOWELL W. WOLTZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

ORDER

W. BRITT, Senior District Judge

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Petitioner's Motion for Recusal (Doc. No. 3), filed October 20, 2008, and Petitioner's Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 9), filed November 26, 2008.

After careful review of the motions and case file, the undersigned finds that the United States Attorney should file a response to these two motions.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than thirty (30) days from the filing of this Order, the United States Attorney shall file a response to Petitioner's Motion for Recusal (Doc. No. 3) and Petitioner's Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 9).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WOLTZ v. U.S
(Mar 2, 2009)