Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PETER WHEELER, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE PATAKI, et al., Defendants.

DECISION ORDER

THOMAS McAVOY, District Judge

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred by this Court to the Hon. George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule N.D.N.Y. 72.3(c). The Report-Recommendation dated February 5, 2009 recommended that Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (dkt. # 26) be granted in part and denied in part such that Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim be dismissed and that Defendants be directed to respond to Plaintiff's due process and retaliation claims. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed and the time to do so has expired. On February 25, 2009, Defendants filed an Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. See Ans. [dkt. # 51].

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein.

It is therefore,

ORDERED that Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (dkt. # 26) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted in that Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim is DISMISSED, and denied as to Plaintiff's due process and retaliation claims.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WHEELER v. PATAKI
(Mar 11, 2009)