AMERICAN INTL. GROUP, INC. v. GREENBERG

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 44, 44A, 44B.

Attorney(S)

Boies, Schiller Flexner LLP, New York (Christopher E. Duffy of counsel), for Maurice R. Greenberg, appellant. Winston Strawn LLP, New York (Vincent A. Sama of counsel), for Howard I. Smith of counsel), for Howard I. Smith, appellant. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher Flom LLP, New York (John L. Gardiner of counsel), for Edward E. Matthews, appellant. Sercarz Riopelle, LLP, New York (Roland G. Riopelle of counsel), for Ernest E. Stempel, appellant. Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP, New York (Jonathan D. Lupkin of counsel), for L. Michael Murphy, appellant. Law Offices of Alan S. Futerfas, New York (Alan S. Futerfas of counsel), for John J. Roberts, appellant. O'Shea Partners LLP, New York (Sean F. O'Shea of counsel), for Houghton Freeman, appellant. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton Garrison LLP, New York (Robert A. Atkins of counsel), for respondent.

Judges

Richard T. Andrias
David B. Saxe
Rolando T. Acosta
Dianne T. Renwick

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., Respondent, v. MAURICE R. GREENBERG et al., Appellants.

The motion court properly declined to grant a stay of proceedings pending resolution of a related action in federal court ( see CPLR 2201; 952 Assoc. LLC v Palmer, 52 AD3d 236, 236-237 ; Mt. McKinley Ins. Co. v Corning Inc., 33 AD3d 51, 58-59). Defendants are former executives and/or directors of plaintiff American International Group, Inc. (AIG), the defendant in the federal action; they are current and/or former directors and/or voting shareholders of the plaintiff in the federal action, Starr International Co., Inc. (SICO). In the federal action, AIG asserted counterclaims against SICO arising out of SICO's alleged obligations to AIG in connection with certain stock. AIG's allegations herein arise out of defendants' alleged independent fiduciary duties to AIG by virtue of their express pledges to preserve the value of said stock. A finding as to SICO's duty to AIG would not affect defendants' potential liability as independent fiduciaries of AIG and would not dispose of or significantly limit the issues involved in this action or pose a risk of inconsistent rulings ( see Belopolsky v Renew Data Corp., 41 AD3d 322; Asher v Abbott Labs., 307 AD2d 211).

We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

[ See 2008 NY Slip Op 33102(U).]

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., Respondent, v. MAURICE R. GREENBERG et al., Appellants.

Comments