AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. APPLE BUILDERS RENOVATORS, INC., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

The motion court properly denied defendants' cross motion, since defendant Apple Builders Renovators, Inc. had executed a written waiver in its retainer agreement with the same law firm specifically waiving any conflict of interest that might arise from the firm's representation of Centennial and Apple. Apple cannot compel the disqualification of plaintiff's counsel simply because the representation to which it consented has since devolved into litigation ( see St. Barnabas Hosp. v New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 7 AD3d 83, 92). Apple's claim that it did not understand the implications of the waiver is unsupported by the clear language of the retainer agreement and the record evidence.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CENTENNIAL INS. CO. v. APPLE BUILDERS
(Mar 17, 2009)