AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANTHONY CLARKE et al., Respondents, v. THE MORGAN CONTRACTING CORPORATION, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Plaintiff, who was employed to perform carpentry work on a construction project at SUNY Downstate Medical Center, was injured when two metal stud beams that were being hoisted from the street were dropped from a sidewalk bridge and landed on his face, chest and shoulders. Plaintiff's met their burden of demonstrating that defendant's failure to provide adequate safety devices was a contributing cause of plaintiff's injuries in violation of section 240 (1) ( see Kielar v Metropolitan Museum of AH, 55 AD3d 456, 458; Greaves v Obayashi Corp., 55 AD3d 409), and plaintiff was not, under any view of the evidence, the sole proximate cause of his injuries ( see Zuluaga v PEC. Constr., LLC, 45 AD3d 479, 480; Kyle v City of New York, 268 AD2d 192, 196, lv denied 97 NY2d 608).

The court properly denied defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs' section 241 (6) claim premised on Industrial Code (12 NYCRR) § 23-1.7 (a) (1). This rule is sufficiently specific to support a cause of action under section 241 (6) ( see Murtha v Integral Constr. Corp., 253 AD2d 637, 639), and a material question of fact remains as to whether the area where the accident occurred was an area "normally exposed to falling material or objects" (Industrial Code § 23-1.7 [a] [1]), and as to whether the sidewalk bridge without safety netting provided appropriate overhead protection to workers in that area.

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CLARKE v. THE MOR. CONT. CORP
(Mar 19, 2009)