Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

SHELLY BISHOP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AT T CORPORATION, Defendant.

ORDER

DONETTA AMBROSE, District Judge

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2009, after the plaintiffs, Shelly Bishop, et al., filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a motion for conditional class certification and judicial notice was submitted by plaintiffs, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge, and upon consideration of the objections filed by defendant and the response to those objections filed by plaintiffs, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 125), which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for conditional class certification andjudicial notice (Docket No. 23) is granted,

AND, the conditional class certification is granted as to customer service representatives employed at the AT T call centers located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Lee's Summit Missouri, El Paso, Texas, and Fairhaven, Massachusetts, three years prior to the date of certification who were not fully compensated for time worked outside their scheduled tours.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BISHOP v. AT T CORPORATION
(Mar 23, 2009)