AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of ANSELMO SOTO, JR., Appellant, v. BRIAN FISCHER, Respondent.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In 1987 the petitioner was sentenced, as a persistent felony offender, to an indeterminate prison term of 25 years to life, upon his conviction of conspiracy in the second degree. The sentencing minutes and the order of commitment were silent as to whether the sentence was to run concurrently with or consecutively to sentences previously imposed upon the petitioner in 1981 and 1984. The New York State Department of Correctional Services (hereinafter the DOCS) subsequently determined that the petitioner's 1987 sentence was to run consecutively to his 1981 and 1984 sentences, and the petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, seeking to annul that determination.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the DOCS did not exceed its authority in determining that his sentences must run consecutively, pursuant to the mandatory provisions of Penal Law § 70.25 (2-a) ( see People ex rel. Gill v Greene, 12 NY3d 1). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SOTO v. FISCHER
(Mar 31, 2009)