AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

In re: BCIF GROUP, L.L.C., Chapter 11, Debtor.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

JAMES MARLAR, Bankruptcy Judge

Before the court is a motion for stay relief filed by secured creditor, Willow Bridge, L.L.C. (Dkt. #31). The Debtor filed a chapter 11 case on December 3, 2008. In its initial petition, the Debtor checked the "single asset real estate" box.

Section 362(d)(3) is the dispositive statute. It provides that, in a single asset real estate case, the court "shall grant relief" unless, within 90 days after the order for relief (here, March 3) the debtor has filed a plan or has commenced payments. Here, it is conceded that the Debtor has met neither condition within the allowed time limits.

Although the court extended the time for the Debtor to file its plan, that extension carried no stay relief implications, either in favor of or against the Debtor. It merely granted the Debtor additional time to file its plan. On April 3, 2009, the Debtor filed its plan.

Nor does the provision of § 362(d)(3) apply, which states that the debtor can gain 30 days after a court determines that the debtor is, in fact, a single-asset debtor. Since, that issue has never been in dispute, it cannot apply to the legal issues here.

That the Debtor may appear to be confused as to when, or under what conditions, it was required to file a plan, is not material to the instant dispute. The plan filing issues are progressing down a parallel track. The only impact that plan filing would have would be if the Debtor either (1) filed a plan within the first 90 days of the case, or (2) obtained an order within the same 90 days extending the time to file a plan. Since no order was entered until March 16, 2009 (Dkt. #34), the Debtor was untimely in its efforts to gain the additional protections of the automatic stay.

Thus, the stay shall be lifted.

A separate order will be entered. FED. R. BANKR. P. 9021.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE BCIF GROUP, L.L.C. (Bankr.D.Ariz. 4-6-2009)
(Apr 6, 2009)