AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE SCOTTS COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants. PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,

The court properly denied appellant's motion to amend the third-party complaint since the proposed amendment did not state a viable claim for relief. The amendment sought to enjoin appellant's coinsurers from proceeding against appellant for contribution based upon appellant's settlement agreement with the insured and upon General Obligations Law § 15-108. The court correctly found that the settlement agreement's express contemplation of contribution claims by the coinsurers was a waiver of section 15-108's protections ( see Mitchell v New York Hosp., 61 NY2d 208, 213). Moreover, section 15-108 applies only to joint tortfeasors, not to coinsurers ( HRH Constr. Corp. v Commercial Underwriters Ins. Co., 11 AD3d 321, 323).

[ See 18 Misc 3d 1139(A), 2008 NY Slip Op 50369(U).]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THE SCOTTS COMPANY v. PACIFIC EMPLOYERS
(Apr 9, 2009)