Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court's failure to impose sanctions for the People's alleged failure to disclose alleged Rosario material ( see People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286, cert denied 368 US 866; CPL 240.45) denied him a fair trial. However, the record does not demonstrate a "factual basis that the [material] in question actually existed and also incorporated statements made by a witness concerning the subject matter of the incident" ( People v Pines, 298 AD2d 179, 180; see People v Smith, 33 AD3d 462, 464; see also People v Melendez, 259 AD2d 500; People v Ray, 224 AD2d 722). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly declined to draw an adverse inference based on the People's alleged failure to disclose alleged Rosario material ( see People v Smith, 33 AD3d at 464; see also People v Melendez, 259 AD2d at 500; People v Ray, 224 AD2d at 722).
The defendant's contention that this matter should be remitted for a Rosario hearing is without merit, since the defendant failed to articulate a factual basis for the assertion that the alleged Rosario material existed ( see People v Brown, 286 AD2d 340, 341; People v Rodriguez, 270 AD2d 505; People v Baptiste, 269 AD2d 536, 537; cf. People v Dockery, 278 AD2d 427, 427-428).