Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. DAVID R. GUNTHER, Defendants.

DECISION and ORDER

THOMAS McAVOY, District Judge

Defendant moves for reconsideration of the Court's denial of his motion for the return of property. As noted in the prior decision, the record evidence before the Court demonstrates that the property was seized on December 12, 2006, Defendant was given notice of the forfeiture both individually and through his assigned defense counsel, Defendant filed a claim concerning the property, and the claim was ruled to be deficient. Defendant was given an opportunity to cure the deficiency, but, apparently failed to do so, As a result, the property was forfeited effective April 17, 2007. Defendant claims he never saw the letter from the DEA noticing that the claim was deficient. The government's evidence, however, demonstrates that the notice was sent to Defendant's attorney via certified mail and received. Accordingly, Defendant's claim must be rejected. Defendant has not identified any valid basis for reconsideration.

Accordingly, his motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. GUNTHER
(Apr 17, 2009)