Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

MARY M. BOILY, an indi v. dual; and VALMORE P. BOILY, her husband, per quod, Plaintiffs,

ORDER

Susan Wigenton, District Judge

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of United States Magistrate Judge Madeline C. Arleo, dated April 1, 2009. The R R concerns Defendant Walt Disney World Company's motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), or in the alternative, to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), as well as Plaintiffs' cross-motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11.

Oral argument on the pending motions was held on March 20, 2009. On that day, Judge Arleo issued a ruling on the record, accompanied by a written Order. Plaintiffs filed an informal motion for reconsideration on March 24, 2009. In a written Opinion and Order dated April 1, 2009, Judge Arleo considers the parties' arguments and recommends that Walt Disney World's motion to dismiss be denied, that its motion to transfer be granted, and that Plaintiffs' cross-motion for sanctions and informal motion for reconsideration be denied. No objection to the April 1st R R was filed.

The Court has reviewed the R R and the briefs and documents on file in this matter. Based on the foregoing, and for good cause shown,

IT IS, on this 1st day of May, 2009,

ORDERED that the R R of Magistrate Judge Arleo dated April 1, 2009, is ADOPTED as the conclusions of law of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that defendant Walt Disney World's motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that all motions for sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 are DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that defendant Walt Disney World's motion to transfer this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida is GRANTED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BOILY v. WALT DISNEY WORLD COMPANY
(May 1, 2009)