AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OMAR CORREA, Appellant.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court's well-reasoned and detailed findings of facts and credibility determinations, which are supported by the record ( see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761). The People established, by clear and convincing evidence, that an occupant of the apartment consented to the police entry ( see People v Gonzalez, 39 NY2d 122). The evidence also supported the court's alternative finding that the officers' entry was justified under the emergency doctrine ( see People v Mitchell, 39 NY2d 173, 177-178, cert denied 426 US 953).

The surcharges and fees were properly imposed ( see People v Guerrero, 12 NY3d 45).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CORREA
(May 5, 2009)