Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

WILLIAM VENSON, also known as ELTON LEE HOLLY, Petitioner, v. J.M. KILLINA, Warden, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondents.

ORDER

WILLIAM STANDISH, Senior District Judge

AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2009, petitioner, William Venson, an inmate at the Otisville Correctional Institution in Otisville, New York, initiated this civil action by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 15, 2009, Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and/or as time-barred. Magistrate Judge Hay further recommended that a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 be denied.

The deadline for filing objections to Magistrate Judge Hay's Report and Recommendation expired on May 4, 2009, and no objections have been filed. Under the circumstances, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hay is adopted as the Opinion of the Court, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody filed by William Venson pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and/or as time-barred.

2. A certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 is denied.

3. In accordance with Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, any party desiring to appeal from this Order must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a Notice of Appeal as provided in Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VENSON v. KILLINA
(May 5, 2009)