Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Vincent Rydell JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

COPE, J. (concurring).

Defendant-appellant Johnson appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. This particular motion was filed by counsel but was filed two days late. The trial court denied the motion as untimely and successive.

The mandate issued in the defendant's direct appeal on October 17, 2005, so the deadline for filing the rule 3.850 motion was October 17, 2007.

Defendant-appellant Johnson may have a basis to refile the motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(3) which excuses the time bar where "the defendant retained counsel to timely file a 3.850 motion and counsel, through neglect, failed to file the motion." As the motion was untimely filed, this portion of the rule may excuse the time bar. See De La Rosa v. State, 979 So.2d 1089, 1089-90 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). However, to refile the motion the defendant must also have a good faith basis to avoid the bar of successiveness. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(f).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JOHNSON v. STATE
(May 4, 2009)