AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of ODYSSEY TRANSPORTATION, LLC, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

Odyssey Transportation, LLC operates a limousine transportation service that works through franchise agreements with its drivers. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that an employment relationship existed between Odyssey and the drivers and assessed it additional unemployment insurance contributions in the amount of $71,262.12. Odyssey appeals.

The record demonstrates that Odyssey assigns jobs to the drivers and requires them to display a company sign and adhere to a dress code. Odyssey sets the rates that clients are charged and handles billing, collections and customer complaints. Drivers are required to submit vouchers each week, are paid 80% to 83% of the fares they collect, are reimbursed for tolls and are paid by Odyssey regardless of whether the client has paid. Drivers are prohibited from working for another ground transportation company and may not use substitute drivers for assignments. Given similar facts, we have consistently held that the Board's determination finding that drivers were employees was supported by substantial evidence, despite the existence of evidence which might support a contrary conclusion ( see Matter of Automotive Serv. Sys., Inc. [Commissioner of Labor], 56 AD3d 854, 855-856; Matter of Spectacular Limo Link, Inc. [Commissioner of Labor], 21 AD3d 1172, 1173; Matter of De Paiua [Olympic Limousine — Commissioner of Labor], 270 AD2d 534, 534-535).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ODYSSEY TRANSP., LLC v. COMM'R. OF LABOR
(May 21, 2009)