AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of COSIMO PANETTA, Appellant, v. RICHARD CARROLL et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

None of the arguments raised by the petitioner on appeal were raised before the Supreme Court prior to its determination. Thus, the arguments are not properly before this Court on appeal ( see Pekich v James E. Lawrence, Inc., 38 AD3d 632). Further, none of the arguments present a question of law which could not have been avoided if raised at the proper juncture. Thus, the arguments may not be reached for the first time on appeal ( id.). Accordingly, the dismissal of the proceeding should be affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COSIMO PANETTA v. RICHARD CARROLL
(May 26, 2009)