AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

In the matter of: ANTONIO ATTARD, Chapter 13, Debtor. ANTONIO ATTARD, Plaintiff(s), v. AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., Defendant(s).

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

THOMAS TUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge

This case comes before the Court on "Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion for Summary Judgment," filed on May 29, 2009 (Docket # 36, the "Motion"), which this Court construes as a motion for reconsideration of the May 20, 2009 Order denying both Defendant's and Plaintiff's motions for summary judgment (Docket # 31), and

The Court having reviewed and considered the motion for reconsideration, and

The Court finds the Motion fails to demonstrate a palpable defect by which the Court and the parties have been misled, and that a different disposition of the case must result from a correction thereof. See Local Rule 9024-1(a)(3).

In addition, the Court notes the following. The summary judgment record does not establish, beyond a genuine issue of material fact, that Wayne County Sheriff Evans did not appoint Adrienne Sanders in a manner permitted by the relevant statutes. And there is no admissible evidence in the current record to support the assertion in the Motion that the specific written appointment referred to was "signed by someone on behalf of the Sheriff, . . ." rather than by the Sheriff himself.

NOW, THEREFORE,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration should be, and hereby is, DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN MATTER OF ATTARD
(Jun 1, 2009)