AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of COLUMBIA SUSSEX CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS et al., Respondents.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The determination of the Commissioner of the respondent New York State Division of Human Rights which found, in effect, that the petitioners unlawfully discriminated against the complainant in relation to her employment by subjecting her to a hostile work environment is supported by substantial evidence, and thus, cannot be disturbed ( see Matter of Hilal v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 57 AD3d 898). Furthermore, the compensatory award is reasonably related to the wrongdoing, supported by substantial evidence, and similar to comparable awards for similar injuries ( see Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v State Div. of Human Rights, 78 NY2d 207, 219; Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Stoute, 36 AD3d 257, 266).

The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CO. SUSSEX CORP. v. N.Y. STATE DIV
(Jun 2, 2009)