Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ALBERT LEWIS HAMILTON, aka Albert Lewis Goldsby, Defendant-Appellant.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Defendant assigns error to the failure to merge his robbery convictions under ORS 161.067(2). We determined in State v. Williams, 229 Or App 79, 209 P3d 842 (2009), in similar circumstances, that, under ORS 161.067(2), robbery crimes committed against more than one victim do not merge. Defendant's pro se supplemental brief challenges the imposition of consecutive sentences without jury findings, an issue decided against him by Oregon v. Ice, 555 US ___, 129 S Ct 711, 172 L Ed 2d 517 (2009).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. HAMILTON
(Jun 10, 2009)