AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARIO SOTO, Appellant.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. There was probable cause for defendant's arrest, because a police officer saw him engage in what the officer reasonably believed to be a drug transaction ( see People v McRay, 51 NY2d 594, 603-604). The record establishes that, in a notorious "drug marketplace" ( id. at 604), the officer saw the transfer of a shiny object that he recognized, based on his experience, to be drug packaging, and not that he merely saw an unidentified object that he assumed to be drugs because of the character of the location. The record also supports the court's alternative finding that the officer recovered a handgun through a legitimate self-protective measure based on reasonable suspicion and concern for his safety.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SOTO
(Jun 16, 2009)