AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

WALTON HOUSTON GALLERIA OFFICE, LLP, Appellant v. BRICKER + CANNADY ARCHITECTS INC., BRICKER + CANNADY, INC.; ALAN JEFFERY BRICKER; AND LORI L. GUNN, Appellees.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Walton Houston Galleria Office, LLP has neither established indigence, nor paid all the required fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207 (Vernon 2005), 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2008); 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2008) (listing fees in court of appeals); FEES CIV. CASES B(1), (3) (listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant Walton Houston Galleria Office, LLP did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We deny all pending motions.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WALTON HOUSTON v. BRICKER + CANNADY, 01-09-00166-CV (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 6-18-2009)
(Jun 18, 2009)