Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

CARLOS RIVERA, Plaintiff, v. G. LAWRENCE, Housing Lieutenant, Mid-State Correctional Facility, Defendant.

DECISION ORDER

THOMAS McAVOY, District Judge

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule N.D.N.Y. 72.3(c). The Report-Recommendation dated March 31, 2009 recommended that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (dkt. # 45) be denied, and that, to the extent that Plaintiff moves for summary judgment in his Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion (dkt. # 47), this motion also be denied. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

Also on March 31, 2009, Magistrate Judge Lowe issued an Order requiring the Clerk to serve on Plaintiff "copies of the electronically-available-only opinions cited on pages 5, 7, 9, 11, 16, and 19 of the Report-Recommendation issued on March 31, 2009." Order, dkt. # 51 (citing Lebron v. Sanders, 557 F.3d 76 (2d Cir. 2009)).

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein.

It is therefore,

ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (dkt. # 45) is DENIED. And it is further

ORDERED that, to the extent that Plaintiff moves for summary judgment in his Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion (dkt. # 47), this motion is also DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RIVERA v. LAWRENCE
(Jun 18, 2009)