Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was for leave to reargue is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying re-argument; and it is further,
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent Surf Coney Island, Inc.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was for leave to renew. The plaintiffs failed to present a reasonable justification for their failure to present certain "new facts" on the original motion and cross motion (CPLR 2221 [e] [3]; see O'Connell v Post, 27 AD3d 631; Renna v Gullo, 19 AD3d 472). In any event, those facts would not have changed the prior determinations ( see CPLR 2221 [e] [2]; Renna v Gullo, 19 AD3d at 472).