Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

BERNADETTE GOTAY, Respondent, v. DAVID BREITBART et al., Defendants, and MICHAEL HANDWERKER et al., Appellants.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, motions for summary judgment by defendants-appellants granted and certified question answered in the negative. Plaintiffs legal malpractice claim was not brought within the applicable statute of limitations period, and defendants-appellants established as a matter of law that the continuous representation doctrine does not apply.

Concur: Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES. Taking no part: Chief Judge LIPPMAN.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOTAY v. BREITBART
(Jun 25, 2009)