AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

MICHAEL FISHER, Plaintiff(s), v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Defendant(s).

ORDER

SUSAN DLOTT, District Judge

This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hogan. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on March 17, 2009 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 96). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 98) and defendants' filed a response to the objections (Doc. 99). The Court held a hearing on this matter on July 23, 2009.

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing and the arguments made by counsel at the July 23, 2009, hearing the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 79) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED and this case is hereby TERMINATED from the docket.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that the reasons set forth for an appeal of this Order will not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FISHER v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
(Jul 23, 2009)