AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

STANLEY A. PUGH, Plaintiff, v. CHESTER DOWNS AND MARINA, LLC, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

EDUARDO ROBRENO, District Judge

AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2009, following a hearing on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (doc. nos. 18 and 22), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant Chester Downs' and Defendant Dougherty's Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 22) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. It is GRANTED to the extent it seeks to dismiss Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims [Counts I — IV] against Defendant Dougherty. It is DENIED to the extent that it seeks to dismiss Plaintiff's state malicious prosecution claim [Count VI] against Defendant Dougherty.

2. Defendant Onick's Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 18) is GRANTED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PUGH v. CHESTER DOWNS MARINA, LLC (E.D.Pa. 7-27-2009)
(Jul 27, 2009)