AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

TOFFLER ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

ORDER

C. JONES II, Judge

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2009, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Hartford Insurance Company's ("Hartford") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
2. Toffler Associates, Inc.'s ("Toffler") Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
3. Hartford had the duty to defend Toffler but did not have the duty to indemnify Toffler.
4. Hartford shall pay to Toffler the amount of $60,861.97 to cover Toffler's costs of defense. Toffler may calculate statutory interest on this amount and seek an amended judgment.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TOFFLER ASSOCIATES, INC. v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO. (E.D.Pa. 7-29-2009)
(Jul 29, 2009)