Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EMMETT MADISON GRAHAM, JR., Defendant.

ORDER

JAMES FOX, Senior District Judge

Emmett Graham has filed what he has styled, "Motion for Correction/Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(2)(2) or Rule 52(B) F.R.O. CRIM. P." [DE-256]. Therein, he contends that his sentence must be corrected so that his consecutive sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) instead runs concurrently. He relies on the interpretation of § 924(c)(1)(A)'s "except clause" in United States v. Whitley, 529 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. 2008).

This court is bound by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals' precedent in this regard, which Whitley itself recognizes is not in agreement with that of the Second Circuit. See Webb v. United States, No. 1:09CV133, No. 1:02CR51-1, 2009 WL 2399946, slip op. at *2 (M.D.N.C. July 31, 2009) (citing United States v. Studifin, 240 F.3d 415, 423-24 (4th Cir. 2001)).

Accordingly, Graham's motion to reduce his sentence [DE-256] is DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. GRAHAM
(Aug 2, 2009)