ORDER
This matter is presently before the Full Commission on claimant's Motion to Correct/Amend the Record. After our consideration of claimant's motion, respondents' response thereto and all other matters properly before the Commission, we find that claimant's motion must be denied.
The Administrative Law Judge issued an opinion on April 30, 2009. Claimant filed a Notice of Appeal on June 5, 2009, which contained claimant's argument on appeal. On July 17, 2009, claimant filed the present motion seeking to have the Administrative Law Judge correct and amend her opinion, specifically requesting that certain facts and opinions regarding these facts be removed. Claimant has not alleged that the Administrative Law Judge considered facts not in evidence, failed to consider material facts in evidence, or created some other factual error. Rather she requests that facts in evidence that were considered by the Administrative Law Judge be removed from the Administrative Law Judge's opinion.
Claimant's present Motion to remand the claim to the Administrative Law Judge to remove language from the Administrative Law Judges' opinion is not a cognizable remedy. The Administrative Law Judge performed her duty to hear the facts, review the exhibits, and render an opinion. If claimant disagrees with the Administrative Law Judge's interpretation of the facts and or law, her remedy is to appeal her claim to the Full Commission. This claimant has done. Accordingly claimant's Motion to Correct/Amend the Record is hereby denied.
Claimant also seeks to have the opinion in her claim removed from the Commission's website. All decisions of the Administrative Law Judges and Full Commission are a matter of public record. Claimant's motion to remove her opinion from the Commission website is hereby denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________________ A. WATSON BELL, Chairman
________________________________ KAREN H. McKINNEY, Commissioner
________________________________ PHILIP A. HOOD, Commissioner