Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MARK ALOE, Defendant.

ORDER

THOMAS THALKEN, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before the court on the motion for an extension of time by defendant Mark Aloe (Aloe) (Filing No. 20). Aloe seeks until November 8, 2009, in which to file pretrial motions in accordance with the progression order. Aloe's counsel represents that Aloe will file an affidavit wherein he consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. Aloe's counsel represents that government's counsel has no objection to the motion. Upon consideration motion will be granted.

IT IS ORDERED:

Defendant Aloe's motion for an extension of time (Filing No. 20) is granted. Aloe is given until on or before November 9, 2009, in which to file pretrial motions pursuant to the progression order. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between August 3, 2009 and November 9, 2009, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. ALOE
(Aug 3, 2009)