AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

NANCY ELLEN VANCE, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES ODELL LATIMER, Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTS VII, VIII AND IX OF THE VERIFIED COMPLAINT

GERALD ROSEN, District Judge

This matter is presently before the Court on the July 6, 2009 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives. In this R R, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on her claims for declaratory judgment of ownership of pro se Defendant Charles Odell Latimer's music and musical works (Count VIII) and for a declaration that Plaintiff is entitled to 20% of Defendant's earnings from musical performances from September 29, 2005 and beyond (Count IX), but that the Court deny Plaintiff's request for an accounting (Count VII). No timely objections to the R R have been filed.

Having reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Court's entire file of this matter, the Court concurs in the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation of July 6, 2009 [Dkt. # 14] is adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's motion for (partial) summary judgment on Counts VII, VIII and IX [Dkt. # 11] is granted in part, and denied in part. Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiff on her claims in Counts VIII and IX for declaratory judgment of ownership of the Defendant's music and musical works and for a declaration that she is entitled to 20% of Defendant's earnings from musical performances since September 29, 2005. Summary judgment, however, is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's Count VII claim for an accounting.

The Court also concurs in the Magistrate Judge's referral of this case to the Michigan Trial Lawyer's Pro Bono in anticipation of trial.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VANCE v. LATIMER
(Aug 11, 2009)