Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

JEROME HOGAN, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES INC., Defendant.

ORDER

DAVID HERNDON, District Judge

Now before the Court is Wal-Mart's July 31, 2009 motion in limine to bar evidence of lost wages and/or lost profits (Doc. 35). On August 7, 2009, the Court held the final pretrial conference in this matter. During the conference, Plaintiff's counsel indicated that Plaintiff does not dispute this motion in limine. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Wal-Mart's motion in limine to bar evidence of lost wages and/or profits.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOGAN v. WAL-MART STORES INC
(Sep 1, 2009)